Comments on: Ventrilo VS TeamSpeak VS Mumble

By: Kal

Kal — Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:12:58 +0000

just to necro this for anyone else coming along and to add to rp3′s comment along with the NP license you can host up to 10 separate servers

By: rp3

rp3 — Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:15:41 +0000

Teamspeak 3 in my opion has pulled ahead of vent. You are only allowed to host yourself 8 slots with vent. Teamspeak 3 on the other hand, you may have a 512 slot non-profit for free. The voice quality of ts3 and automatic voice gain control of all clients makes for a very nice talking environment. Why vent does not give out non-profit idk.

By: The Vertical Sleeve

The Vertical Sleeve — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:42:04 +0000

I use vent for a chat server for a neverwinter nights persistent world I run. From a non bandwidth perspective, vent seems to do better in wireless situations. This comes from first hand experience and what’s been relayed by my users.

If bandwidth is a concern look for Roger Wilco, it’s less bandwidth intense but it’s somewhat inferior in quality. You will find yourself repeating a lot, and be prepared for a more ‘tin man’ like sound.

By: amp

amp — Wed, 19 May 2010 04:06:45 +0000

Been there done that. The only problem is mumble isn’t as mainstream (unfortunately)… :sadface:

By: fwaggle

fwaggle — Wed, 19 May 2010 03:52:47 +0000

FWIW TeamSpeak 2 was limited to no more than 1,000 users for a non-profit/clan license… any more than that and you had to pay for it. I’ve no idea what the license for TS3 is.

Mumble’s only limited by the upstream bandwidth of your provider, an old Pentium4 or an Atom will run Murmur and happily saturate a 100mbps port if you have enough chatty people online.